Djana research centre nomination points
Open in chat • 12 posts (analysis)
• Page 1 of 1
In the [Djana Military Research Centre] Ancient technology research collaboration thread more than four players roleplay to continue the story of the Masuk' faik-khush artifact.
Therefor I would like to nominate the player sfor a reward.
Therefor I would like to nominate the player sfor a reward.
- Veolion Commonwealth 2
- Teprogrenaian Consensus 2
- Hiocan Society 2
- Praetorian Empire 1
- Unified Republic of Darya 1
Could you give a short justification for the distribution of
over the participating worlds? (I.e., why do some worlds get 1, and other get 2?)
over the participating worlds? (I.e., why do some worlds get 1, and other get 2?)Veolian Commonwealth and Teprogrenaian Consensus 2 have given the tour and should get extra point for that.
The Hiocan Society has given a presentation, so they also get an extra point.
The Praetorian Empire and Unified Republic of Darya get 1 as they only took part of the tour.
The Hiocan Society has given a presentation, so they also get an extra point.
The Praetorian Empire and Unified Republic of Darya get 1 as they only took part of the tour.
I concur with the reasoning behind it. But that is a hollow approval, since I am benefitting from this. I'd like for at least two uninvolved players to say something.
Sounds fair
The Unified Republic of Darya only contributed 1 post as far as I can see where a character sat down. The ACA contributed with an argument from Nathan and I would give them a point instead of the Unified Republic of Darya. (If this is just about the Ancient technology research collaboration post).
@Fedor: good point. The ACA had more impact than the Daryans here.
I concur, there was actually quite a roleplay discussion before the tour started. I think that the ACA deserves a point, and sorry for the Daryans, but their contribution just was not substantial.
Based on the previous comments, the concensus seems to be the following distribution:
- Veolion Commonwealth 2
- Teprogrenaian Consensus 2
- Hiocan Society 2
- Praetorian Empire 1
- Astrian Colonial Authority 1
-

Mercury - Storyteller
I just checked to act as a neutral player and I feel the reward here is too low. We gave out 3
for the winner of the beauty contest, to name one. I would suggest raising the reward for all participants by 1.
for the winner of the beauty contest, to name one. I would suggest raising the reward for all participants by 1.That would make the final distribution:
If no objections are raised, I'll update the wiki in the coming weekend.
- Veolion Commonwealth 3

- Teprogrenaian Consensus 3

- Hiocan Society 3

- Praetorian Empire 2

- Astrian Colonial Authority 2

If no objections are raised, I'll update the wiki in the coming weekend.
While updating the
for this story, I discovered that a more modest reward was already handed out (IP Nomination for 'Ancient technology research collaboration <private>').
Since this reward is more in line with our ideas from the Write-a-thon on IP gaining and spending, I will replace the old reward with this new one. (This is allowable because this reward subsumes the previous one, so any
spending remains valid)
(Next time, please check if a reward has already been handed out when you update the story page 2 months after the story finished.)
for this story, I discovered that a more modest reward was already handed out (IP Nomination for 'Ancient technology research collaboration <private>').Since this reward is more in line with our ideas from the Write-a-thon on IP gaining and spending, I will replace the old reward with this new one. (This is allowable because this reward subsumes the previous one, so any
spending remains valid)(Next time, please check if a reward has already been handed out when you update the story page 2 months after the story finished.)
12 posts (analysis)
• Page 1 of 1

