Union members: Status_rule or Status_ref
Open in chat • 3 posts (analysis)
• Page 1 of 1
We have some data on the status of Union Members. This is used in multiple places to determine who is a core world, and who is an inner world, etc. However, it just occurred to me that we link to the
Might it be better to do this with IC information? That would mean replacing the current
The tricky thing is that these statusses have sematical value both IC and OOC. Which is why we have both Inner Worlds (IC) and Inner World (OOC).
Maybe we should just keep it as is, but create better linkage between the IC and OOC version of the page?
rules: namespace.Might it be better to do this with IC information? That would mean replacing the current
Status_rule: Inner World with Status_ref: Inner Worlds, but the real work would be fixing queries everywhere (in the wiki, and in tools)The tricky thing is that these statusses have sematical value both IC and OOC. Which is why we have both Inner Worlds (IC) and Inner World (OOC).
Maybe we should just keep it as is, but create better linkage between the IC and OOC version of the page?
-

Mercury - Storyteller
I'd propose linking to the rules page, which contains relevant data, and from there providing linkage to the IC list of Inner Worlds.
Sounds good. Will link pages today.
3 posts (analysis)
• Page 1 of 1
